Sculpture
can be considered to be the leaders of contemporary art. Products of the
twenty-first century seemed to have two distinct ideas: assemblage and unmonumentality.
Assemblage was seen to be a strategy to achieve unmonumentality in sculptural
works. During the first two decades of the twentieth century the first
experiments in using found objects in sculpture were explored in Europe. Contemporary
sculptures have adopted a method of juxtaposition of forms, rather than
compositionally blending them. Other criterion was introduced to the discourse
of contemporary art when an ‘empathetic’ engagement was made with daily objects
and life through sculpture. Some artists claimed that through juxtaposition
they were able to turn familiar objects into mysterious ones. It has been
suggested that distinctions between twentieth and twenty-first century
assemblage comes down to the availability of information, especially through
graphic interfaces. ‘Assemblage’ or ‘neo-dada’ never became a movement or
period. Influential critics referred to the era as ‘neo-avant-garde’, as it
showed a deep divide between pre-World War II and post-war art. ‘Physiognomic
fallacy’ was a term used by E. H Gombrich, which explored the assumption that
artistic forms are direct reflections of the nature of the society that
produced it. Therefore assemblage could rather be the result of disorder within
the world at the time, instead of a means to reflect it. Art historian Roger
Shattuck referred to artist Robert Rauschenburg as a less gifted descendent of
the dada originals. Rauschenburg countered such remakes by saying ‘the artist
who has his foot in a history book and an eye on himself can move but not
directly’. Such retorts showed Rauschenburg’s intent to utilise styles and
techniques from past artists but still plan to create his own path of the style
through his work. It can be seen that sculptors today don’t focus on ‘what art
can be’, but rather how their works can engage in issues of contemporary
life. The term ‘unmonumental’ is meant
to describe a type of sculpture that is not against ‘monumental’ values-
massiveness, timelessness- but rather intentionally lacks them.
No comments:
Post a Comment