Even though minimal art is not often site-specific it does
work in unison with the selected space and the space can alter of influence its
meaning. Often however the artwork can
be moved and a new artwork/location influence is formed. Richard Serra was one of the artists that
challenged this idea. Serra wanted to “attack”
a given space rather than work beside it. Serra and Bruce Nauman both created
works which were aggressive towards the viewer, forcing participation and
placing the viewer in an unpleasant situation.
Even though they are both interventions there is a clear contrast
between Andre’s work where the viewer can choose if they want to participate
and Serra and Nauman's work where they are forced.
During the mid 1960s the principles of the museum also
changed. What was once something to
aspire to, having your art hanging in a gallery, was now the subject of
critique and even anger. With this,
artists such as Michael Asher created works that were challenging the idea of a
museum or art gallery. In the Claire
Copley Gallery in 1974, Asher removed all the internal walls of the gallery
meaning the viewer was confronted by all the internal workings of the gallery.
The location, the space itself is the artwork.
With site-specific installation the artwork is made
completely for that space and that space only.
If you were to move it, it would no longer have meaning. The artwork is not just an object, but an
object attached to a space in which it inhabits, and in the extreme case of
artists like Asher, the actual space itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment