Clock Time by Rosalind Krauss
Rosalind Krauss’ article Clock Time examines Christian Marclay’s most recent work The Clock (2010). Krauss uses her term ‘technical support’ to describe Marclay’s use of commercial sound film in which he joins end to end film clips to create pure synchronicity.
In his anthology of film clips Video Quartet (2002) Marclay uses sound synchronicity where in The Clock he projects synch time (projection at twenty four frames per second, synchronised with the psycho-physiological facts of optics) which allows for a seamless movie via the “phi effect” where frozen images cut together at a certain speed per second create constant motion.
Marclay gives being or identity to the audience through what Louis Althusser describes as “Ideological State Apparatuses” where the viewers are transformed into the role of the subject. Marclay does this through his use of sync time where he coordinates the watches and clocks of the ‘reel time’ with the audiences ‘real time’. His series of film clips feature suspenseful, anticipatory shots of characters staring at clocks and watches in fear of what disaster awaits them. With the viewers taking on the position of the camera and role of the subject, they too experience this sense of uneasy anticipation.
Marclay, through his “technical support” and methodologies of pure synchronisation, Krauss states that The Clock has given rise to the ‘ “invention” of a technical support and, consequently, a new medium’.
While Krauss is an art critic and theorist, I felt that this article was aimed at an audience with a greater understanding of theories and ideologies in contemporary art. At times I found this article difficult to understand due to it’s technical vocabulary such as “intermittent reperfusion”, “phi effect” and “interpellation”. I spent alot of time researching terms so as to understand what Krauss was discussing. A critical evaluation of this film could have been more reader friendly with an understandable explanation of the terminology or simplified vocabulary. I also felt that the article made so many references to other films, ideologies and theories, which to the uneducated reader, made a short piece into what became a very long read due to the research required to make sense of her piece.
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
An Archival Impulse by Hal Foster
Hal Fosterʼs essay, An Archival Impulse, discusses the pervasiveness and the avantegarde
manifestations of contemporary archival art. Traditionally archival artists categorized
historical information in an institutionalised museum format. Foster suggests that today,
even though archival works may differ in artistic characteristics, he points out that they
share ʻa notion of artistic practice as an idiosyncratic probingʼ into all aspects of society,
events and history. He believes that contemporary archives are informal and ʻramify like
weedsʼ through ʻmutations of connection and disconnectionʼ.
Although Foster makes reference to many archival artists, he focuses on the works of
Thomas Hirschhorn, Sam Durant and Tacita Dean for their international standing in
archival art, saying that these three artists alone ʻpoint to an archival impulse at work
internationally in contemporary art.ʼ
Furthermore, Foster states that this ʻimpulseʼ is not new, citing the works of Alexander
Rodchenko (1920ʼs) and John Heartfield (1930-1950), yet he believes that due to the
recent works of Hirschhorn, Durant and Dean, an archival impulse now has itsʼ own
distinct character and is becoming a ʻtendency in itʼs own rightʼ, focussing on their ability to
use mass culture in a ʻdisturbedʼ and obscure way which presents the viewer with an
ʻalternative knowledge or counter-memory.ʼ
Foster suggests that contemporary archives are brought to ʻlifeʼ allowing the audience the
opportunity to experience the innovative practices of the archival impulse, emotionally
engage with and ask questions of the artworks. He looks at Hirschhorn to support this by
quoting that he seeks to “distribute ideas,” “liberate activityʼ” and “radiate energy” which he
does with his “direct sculptures,” “altars,” “kiosks,” and “monuments” Foster implies that
these artists are less interested in ʻabsolute originsʼ and more with ʻobscure tracesʼ and
they are drawn to ʻunfulfilled beginnings or incomplete projects, that might offer points of
departure againʼ. Foster refers to Tacita Deanʼs variety of mediums used in her art and
how she produces a more symbolic representation of archival work which he says is
ʻalways incompleteʼ. By looking at her various works including the “sound mirrors” at
Denge by Dungeness, he reiterates his point, as he calls it, a ʻreopened futureʼ or ʻpoint of
departure'. Durant serves to support Fosterʼs view of archival artists using mass culture in
a disturbed artistic form. His work is eclectic and disorderly yet still has a vital role in
archival art.
Fosterʼs article provides the audience with an informed view of contemporary archival art
by examining artisits on an international level. To support his points he looks at the
acclaimed archival artists Thomas Hirschhorn, Sam Durant and Tacita Dean.
manifestations of contemporary archival art. Traditionally archival artists categorized
historical information in an institutionalised museum format. Foster suggests that today,
even though archival works may differ in artistic characteristics, he points out that they
share ʻa notion of artistic practice as an idiosyncratic probingʼ into all aspects of society,
events and history. He believes that contemporary archives are informal and ʻramify like
weedsʼ through ʻmutations of connection and disconnectionʼ.
Although Foster makes reference to many archival artists, he focuses on the works of
Thomas Hirschhorn, Sam Durant and Tacita Dean for their international standing in
archival art, saying that these three artists alone ʻpoint to an archival impulse at work
internationally in contemporary art.ʼ
Furthermore, Foster states that this ʻimpulseʼ is not new, citing the works of Alexander
Rodchenko (1920ʼs) and John Heartfield (1930-1950), yet he believes that due to the
recent works of Hirschhorn, Durant and Dean, an archival impulse now has itsʼ own
distinct character and is becoming a ʻtendency in itʼs own rightʼ, focussing on their ability to
use mass culture in a ʻdisturbedʼ and obscure way which presents the viewer with an
ʻalternative knowledge or counter-memory.ʼ
Foster suggests that contemporary archives are brought to ʻlifeʼ allowing the audience the
opportunity to experience the innovative practices of the archival impulse, emotionally
engage with and ask questions of the artworks. He looks at Hirschhorn to support this by
quoting that he seeks to “distribute ideas,” “liberate activityʼ” and “radiate energy” which he
does with his “direct sculptures,” “altars,” “kiosks,” and “monuments” Foster implies that
these artists are less interested in ʻabsolute originsʼ and more with ʻobscure tracesʼ and
they are drawn to ʻunfulfilled beginnings or incomplete projects, that might offer points of
departure againʼ. Foster refers to Tacita Deanʼs variety of mediums used in her art and
how she produces a more symbolic representation of archival work which he says is
ʻalways incompleteʼ. By looking at her various works including the “sound mirrors” at
Denge by Dungeness, he reiterates his point, as he calls it, a ʻreopened futureʼ or ʻpoint of
departure'. Durant serves to support Fosterʼs view of archival artists using mass culture in
a disturbed artistic form. His work is eclectic and disorderly yet still has a vital role in
archival art.
Fosterʼs article provides the audience with an informed view of contemporary archival art
by examining artisits on an international level. To support his points he looks at the
acclaimed archival artists Thomas Hirschhorn, Sam Durant and Tacita Dean.
annotations
Rosalind
E. Krauss
clock
time
Ananlyses
the practice of the artist Christian Marclay through his work clock
time. Elements of film history are mentioned such as his play with
the silent film era. Proposing that Marclay uses synchronicity as-'
the undeniable support for post-1929 film and thus for cinema
itself'.the way in which the artist uses synch sound in video quartet
and synch time in the clock 'underlying conditions of film' are. how
the use of synch time in the clock causes interpellation which is
described 'as the subject "recognises" himself as the
addressee of a command, thus identifying with the commander' via
Althusser's “Ideological State of the Apparatuses”which causes
the viewer to become passive. Kraus also states this interpellation
synchronises the audience with the 'temporal unfolding of events in
the film.' the 'plot unfolds through the sights of the dials
displayed on clocks and watches, and the reaction shots of horrified
characters in the...clips...members of the audience glance at their
watches and realise that the precise moment displayed on the screen
matches the moment registered on their own wrists'.Marclays story
unfolds within film clips in which characters anticipate a
catastropy. These clips taken from mainstream movies with characters
such as Sean Connery but kraus states unlike these movies 'the
temporal arcs that produce the plots..is not synchronised with the
suspense unfolding in the viewer's real time'.Parallel to this Kraus
goes on to mention how Annette Michelson characterises Michael Snow's
Wavelength as 'the very distillation of suspense' in the contorting
of horizons to create a narrative thus a feeling of 'distended
temporality' occurs and how this turns upon our cognition thus
suspending our resolution. Kraus ends by stating The Clock
simultaneity,enacted by the synchronous gearing of reel time into
real time, flirts with Husserl's desire for the self-present
instant,the revelation of self-presence in the “now-effect.”
Hal
Foster
An
Archival Impulse
contemplates
the Artistic urge towards the 'archival impulse.' Examples are given
through the works of three prominent archival artists Thomas
Hirschhorn,Sam Durant,Tacita Dean. These artists foster states that
'share a notion of artistic practice as an idiosyncratic probing into
particular figures,objects,and events in modern art, philosophy, and
history. Foster discerns that the trend of 'archival impulse with a
distinctive character of its own is once again pervasive'.'archival
artists seek to make historical information, often lost or displaced,
physically present.to this end they elaborate on the found
image,object,and text'.some archival art can push the 'post modern
complications of originality others may imply the the optimum medium
for archival art is the 'mega archive of the internet'.Foster states
archival artists are often drawn to unfulfilled beginnings or
incomplete projects-in art and history.'the archives at issue here
are not databases in this sense:they are recalcitrantly material,
fragmentary rather than fungible, and as such they call out for human
interpretation'.Although they' remain indeterminate like the contents
of any archive, and often are presented in this fashion'.Some
archival artists play on the collection of the museum etc. but
apparently not as critique? Foster does on to state 'in this respect
archival art is often more “institutive” than “destructive,
more “legislative” than “transgressive.”quoted on Derrida's
terms of description to describe opposing drives in archive fever:a
Freudian impression. In this article Hirschorn is the recoverer of
'radical figures',Dean 'recalls lost souls' and Durant's art brings
to the surface 'repressed contents (to) return disruptively'.
SUMmary 'the archival impulse' Hal Foster
In 'The archival Impulse', Foster quickly ensures and with sniper
like accuracy to identify that he is not compelled to assess the Van Ronkian
beginnings of histography but more so with its failed ambitions and projects as
point of departure form intellectualized linear progression to the notions of
artistic record keeping.(3)[1] In
order to outline the contemporary interest in such objectives foster presents
us with multiple artists as if to subtly make reference to the ‘movement’. A
smart witted underlying tongue in cheek gesture or maybe an over looked
difference in reading?
The reader is asked to
consider notions of the ‘archive’ in
a standard under standing as the simple cataloguing of historical information
in an organized and linear manner. Although as to quickly refute this Foster
brings our attention to notions of the readymade. Here though how ever a link
is made to the largest source of information currently available (from our
couch). The internet be the most readily accessed un-organized catalogue of
information available.[2]
Foster ensures to point out that ‘archival art
differs from database art’ and thus draws attention to the anthropological
notions of the museum.
Foster focuses his following
conversation under the two headlines of ‘Archive as Capitalist Garbage Bucket’ where by the work of Hirschhorn is discussed as
dedications to artists, writers and philosophers and one may draw a frustration
in the acceptance of free thought as it is noted he once functioned as a
communist. The second being ‘Archive
as Failed Futuristic Vision’ in which we are presented with the failed utopian
visions of modernity, a failure in the sense of the attempt to direct the ‘cannon’
that was ultimately self annihilating as it sought to sink thoughts into the
past.
Fosters
reading is effective and interesting the
readers linear understanding of archive. In dispelling these notion a thought
as to current modalities of archive are served up as a new and interesting form
of artistic practice.
[1] “But this relative disconnection from the present might be
a distinctive mode of connection to it: a "whatever" artistic culture
in keeping with
a "whatever" political culture.” An interesting notion if one takes
into account a current resurgence in the nihilist attitude as contemporary mode
of critical engagement with post-structuralisms ever watchful and critical eye.
It might be in saying ‘what ever’ that a critique of the notions of past
linearity are sought to be essentially re-written.
[2] I think it important here thought to
address the trending dangers in the use of such a largely authoured source, this in digital terms we could see this as a Tumblr-centric notion
where critical engagement is dispelled in favour of aesthetic appreciation and
thus re-authoring projecting a trajectory askew from original intentions.
Please take note that I refer here to the aesthetic manner of this and am not
unaware that the questionable nature of ‘truth’ is not one to be utilized and
thus critiqued.
Article SUMmary/Evaluation 'Clock Time' Rosalind Kraus
In
‘Clock time’, Krauss begins with a very clear standpoint as to her terming of
Marclay’s use of the cinematic medium what she terms to be ‘technical support’. Here Kruass defines her notions (via
footnoting herself in the first paragraph) of the post-medium centric practices
that she has observed in the contemporary period. A play if you will on the
Greenburgian notions of medium specificity as the true notion of arts intent.
Instead here we are asked to observe the very means of using the post-produced as
to allow for production and critical engagement with what is presented before
us (213).
In
order to begin this analysis and terming of the framework we are asked to
observe Marclay’s piece ‘Video Quartet’ (a four channel projection). By breaking down the ‘synchronicity of the pieces flow the reader is
subtly asked to observe an evolutionary point in which the medium of cinema has
progressed from a voiceless visual to that of a medium with a voice.[1]
As
to further exemplify the medium of ‘cinema’ we are asked to consider the
‘masterpiece’ work of ‘the clock’ 2010
(214).[2]
The introduction of the piece as ‘Projected in video on a wall as a
segmented twelve by twenty-one foot image’ is one
that I believe again plays on the very notions of medium specifity as to
question, ‘what happens when the medium is bigger than the message’ or
paradoxly from a viewing point ‘What happens when the message is bigger than the medium’?
In the use of the two works the reader is
asked to take into account both ‘sound’ and ‘time’ with a particular importance
drawn to the notion of 'synchronicity' (214, 216) as I believe to draw attention to the notion of the gaze.[3]
What
is perception when essentially what has occurred is the highlighting of the
parallax. The parallel space here being that of the very space of observation,
the viewer is aware that the notion of the film has to have a cycle and I don't
believe . The notion of the viewer and the hyper-real movement of a camera
seamlessly floating through space only serve as to distance the viewer form the
event and more specifically draw attention to a focus on the medium.[4] A
period of self awareness is created in the hope to actually allow for the
viewer to become aware of the self and its mere significance in the advent of
the ‘suspenseful’ spectacle at hand.
[1] Essentially
an elevation of the mediums role upon the viewer or consumer. This could be
likened to the post-post-production of Tim and Eric and their acceptance of the
glitch as a means of causing a rupture in the typical viewing cycle of the
television medium, how ever in this case a historiographical shift as to serve as a
counterpoint in order to consider the very means of the abiity to post produce
upon a medium.
[2] I
would provide a breakdown of the format of the piece how ever this would serve
to simply to undermined the very notions of the work being a masterpiece. It is
via this label that I believe that anybody drawn to consider the article would
have a clear understanding of the piece.
[3] Not only a
feminist framework of interpretation as seen in the bond movies when the male
spectator is also compelled to take on the role of the lead actor. The female
gaze is also addressed essentially making it the perfect date movie. But also
to the Lacanian notion of the ‘eye’ and the ‘gaze’ in this case how ever I
don’t believe it to be the reflexive anxieties of a media saturated viewer in
question but more so that of Marclay and what he might perceive as a stain in
the medium. By acting as the stain here Marclay may serve himself as the
sacrificial lamb in an attempt that his self removal, in place of recognizable
imagery, will hopefully create a dialectical dessenus with the viewer.
[4] Derrida and post structuralism are used
as a support for the means of which one can read the idea of 'technical
support'. It is as if to say that by removing logical (or perhaps better
'learnt') Newtonian time that the viewer is subject to a philosophical reading
of the understanding of everyday media and its effect on understanding of medium.
It is via this noton of spectacle that I think that the worn couches now in
storage would reflect a different story. It is as if the spectacle of the
blockbuster (both in its size of screen and seating arrangement) that has
created a sense of inertia in the public that sought past the uncomfortable critique
of the self as subject. In the 'notion of checking ones watch' against that of
Derrida's statement that any inward thought is one of fiction. Marclay here has
caused the viewer to undergo a subconscious post-structural reading of
themselves as viewer. It is not the screen that is the point of critique but
instead the audience who has become the 'technical support' in the pieces
critique. Suspense maybe an attempt as to create a sense of waiting but it is
in this typical structure of film narrative (lets wait for the sequel) that I
believe that Marclay has not given the Newtonian hand the slap that it
deserves. Instead the clocks hand has taken a seat and what has occurred is essentially
a careful skilled youtubian snippet of the day of a stoner. Sorry Krauss but
its back to the beug and couch for you.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Summary –Hal Foster
In this essay examines three contemporary artists whose work uses the concept of archives, he choose to look at Thomas Hirschhorn, Sam Durant, and Tacita Dean while there are many artists use archival today.
The first and probably the most notable function of archival art is to “make historical information, often lost or displaced, physically present. To this end elaborate on the found image, object, and favor the installation format. Foster suggests that while art has absorbed much of the language of the digital age, like “inventory,” “sample,” “share,” and “interactivity,” archival art remains an obstinately physical calling for “human interpretation, not mechanic reprocessing.
The three artists he mentioned made very different archival works. The first he pointed is Thomas Hirschhorn who creates direct sculptures, altars, kiosks, and monuments. Each of these installations focuses on historical figures, such as artists and philosophers, and attempt to “expose different audiences to alternative archives of public culture. Tacita Dean uses many mediums to recall “lost souls” in her work. Foster notes that archival artists are “often drawn to unfulfilled beginnings or incomplete projects” a theme undoubtedly present in Dean’s work, she presents the past as always incomplete. In one example of her work she retraces the steps of a stowaway girl and records the coincidences that seem to echo the girls journey that ended in a shipwreck. The last artist Foster discusses is Sam Durant. Durant is similar to Dean in that he uses multiple mediums in this work but differs in that his source material is much more eclectic pulling from the histories of rock-and-roll, art, architecture, literature, social activism, as well as others. He often pairs these materials in a way that seems to encourage disorder. One example is his citing of Smithson’s Partially Buried Woodshed installed on the campus of Kent State, the site of the shooting of four students by National Guardsman.
The move to turn excavation sites into construction sites is welcome in another way too, it suggest a shift away from a melancholic culture that views the historical as little more than the traumatic.
Clock Time summary
In this article, Rosalind E.Krauss pointed about the Christian Marclay and his one of his most latest artwork The Clock. The technical support is commercial sound film from which he has extrapolated that process into pure synchoronicity. This work is also a compilation of film clip.
The Clock a 24 hour running combination of film clips which while being projected relate to each exact time of day. In The Clock , we confront what must be called another of the underlying conditions of film-synch time. The clock synch-time joins viewer and screen in the manner of what the film scholars call interpellation. In attracts the audience and makes them thinking about the time and the space they are in, however by watching the work they also lose track of time by thinking about it. Marclay’s The Clock exploits the cutway as its “plot” unfolds through the sights of the dials displayed on clocks and watches.
The Clock by Marclay has some relationship with the real time. The Clock’s simultaneity, enacted by the synchronous gearing of reel time into real time. Marclay manages this by turning to suspense as the extended dilation of the now effect, transforming the reel time of film into the real time of waiting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)