Vito Acconci
Step Piece, 1970
Photograph of a performance in his studio
In the reading Some Relations between Conceptual
and Performance Art by Frazer Ward focuses on the overlap of the categories of
conceptual and performance art during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Ward discusses the dematerialisation and minimalist approach to both
conceptual and performance art. The material considerations became secondary in
conceptual works and the temporal status of performance further evoked these
same feelings. There was a loss of aestheticisim and not only did this
dematerialisation of art have huge influence on how artists worked, but both
conceptual and performance art became engaged in a continuing dialogue,
particularly in performance where the artists used their bodies as a pathway to
text and used "their bodies (to)…point to the contingent, social
construction of subjectivity”. There was a critical reception of art in
galleries. Art was now being made for artists and their movement from the
gallery space to a studio space helped artists began to create works that no
longer existed as a commodity.
Ward produces two artists, Ian Burn's conceptual driven Mirror Piece
(1967 and Vito Acconci's performance Step Piece (1970). Burn’s
work is described as unambiguous and “typically Conceptual in its abandonment
of aesthetic authority”. Mirror Piece consists
of thirteen typed pages of notes and diagrams, a mirror, both which have been
framed and covered with glass. His notes are his ‘description’ of his work,
explaining its ‘intentional’ function and importance of the gallery space in the
identification of the mirrors function. Acconci’s Step Piece features an eighteen-inch stool set up in his aparment
and used as a morning workout until he was unable to contiune. He would
reguarly send out announcements informing the public of his progress. His work
also serves as a rebellion against the gallery space, in allowing the public to
watch his performances from his studio, completely abloishing the idea of an
institution.
Rosalind Krauss and Greogory Battock, in Idea Art (1973) remark on the rationalisation of conceptual art and
the uncertainty of the place of performance as performance was never made a
“movement”. Ward also examines how
conceptual art took to remove the traditional elements of aestheticism in order
to elimate the ‘elite’ factor, causing frustration from the audience as they
did not fully comprehend the rationalisim of Conceptual art.
No comments:
Post a Comment